 |

A CRITICAL
REVIEW OF "MYTHS AND MYTH-MAKERS" From Shattered Sword,
by Jonathan Parshall and Anthony Tully
AND TRIBUTE TO AN AMERICAN HERO
LCDR JOHN d' ARC LORENZ, USN
PART I
In their recent book Shattered Sword, coauthors Jonathan
Parshall and Anthony Tully include a chapter entitled "Myth
and Mythmakers", in which they question a number of historical
facts and conclusions of Japanese military historians Mitsuo
Fuchida and Masatake Okumiya, authors of Midway: The Battle
That Doomed Japan, a well-respected book on the Battle of
Midway written in 1955. The conclusions of Parshall and Tully
have far-reaching implications for the current understanding
of the history of the Battle of Midway, and therefore deserve
a critical review.
As President of the International Midway Memorial Foundation
(IMMF), I, Jim D'Angelo, intend to provide a critical review
of the chapter in a three part series beginning with this
issue of the "Midway Sentinel." The assertions of Parshall
and Tully will be reviewed in the chronological order in
which they occurred in the battle. I will proceed by quoting
the questioned historical fact first, followed by Parshall
and Tully's response, as they do in their book. These
statements will be followed by a series of historical quotes
and finally a discussion and conclusion. All radio
communications described in this review will be dated in
Tokyo time.
Assertion # 1: "During the transit to Midway, Admiral Yamamoto
withheld important intelligence from Admiral Nagumo that
might have changed the course of the battle. As a result,
Nagumo was in the dark concerning the nature of the threat
facing him at Midway." Parshall and Tully's response:
"Not true."
In order to understand this issue, it is important that one
appreciate the sequence of events involved in the flow of
traffic of radio intelligence from one area of the Pacific
to another. Radio intelligence from lower units operating
in the Pacific were to transmit the information up the chain
of command so that ultimately, the messages were received
by the First Communications Unit in Tokyo
(FCU).[1] The FCU
would then re-broadcast the information to the various fleet
commands, which were heading toward Midway. One must also
be informed of why it may have been possible that Nagumo
did not receive any of the radio intelligence sent to him
from Tokyo. The answer lies in the construction of the
ships of the "Kido Butai" (Japanese task force) that had
small bridge structures and mainmasts.[2]
This construction left few high places on the ships to
place the aerial in a location that would provide optimum
radio reception.
It is appropriate at this point to document what Admiral
Yamamoto and Admiral Nagumo did and did not know.
The following is a list of radio reports that were sent
from Tokyo's FCU to command fleets and were documented by
Fuchida and, independently, by Admiral Matoma Ugaki in
his diary, except for Message Number 7 which is quoted from
Gordon Prange, author of Miracle at Midway. The
format is a record of the date of the radio transmission
followed by quotes, by Fuchida, Ugaki and Prange, which
document what radio messages were actually transmitted
at this time.
Message Number 1. May 30, 1942:
Fuchida: "Yamato's radio crew, which was keeping a close
watch on enemy communications traffic, intercepted a long
urgent message sent by an enemy submarine from a position
directly ahead of Japanese Transport
Group."[3]
Ugaki: "According to radio interception, an enemy sub
supposed to be either ahead or in the vicinity of our
Transport Force dispatched a long, urgent message to
Midway."[4]
Message Number 2. May 31:
Fuchida: "Meanwhile, Yamamoto's radio intelligence unit
observed further signs of enemy activity, especially of
aircraft and submarines, in both the Hawaii and Aleutians
vicinity."[5]
Ugaki: "A radio interception indicates that enemy planes
and subs in the Aleutian Islands, Hawaiian Islands and the
mid-Pacific are engaged in brisk activities. Exchanges of
urgent messages are at a very unusual
rate."[6]
Message Number 3. May 31:
The following intelligence quotes are regarding Operation
K, a plan designed to determine whether the American carriers
were in Pearl Harbor. A Japanese seaplane would fly from
Wotje to French Frigate Shoals, in the mid Hawaiian Island
chain, refuel by submarine and fly to Pearl Harbor for
aerial reconnaissance.
Fuchida: "This made it apparent that the enemy was already
using the Shoals as a seaplane base, and there was no
alternative to complete abandonment of Operation K. These
disappointing developments were promptly communicated to
Admiral Yamamoto in Yamato."[7]
Ugaki: "Our reconnaissance of the enemy was insufficient.
An advance attempt to reconnoiter the Hawaii district by
Type Two flying boats couldn't be carried out, as two
enemy vessels were in French Frigate
Shoals."[8]
Message Number 4. June 1:
Fuchida: "Radio intelligence disclosed a marked intensification
of communications traffic out of Hawaii, and 72 out of 180
intercepted messages were 'urgent', indicating an unusually
tense situation."[9]
Ugaki: "Out of over 180 radio exchanges observed in the
Hawaii district, as many as seventy-two were tagged
'urgent'."[10]
Message Number 5. June 1:
Fuchida: "A chance encounter 500 miles north-northeast of
Wotje between a Japanese patrol plane from that island and
an American flying boat, which exchanged brief machine bursts,
also showed that the enemy had extended his Midway-based
air patrols out to a radius of 700
miles."[11]
Ugaki: "Moreover, another flying boat from Wotje Island
sighted an enemy flying boat at a point five hundred miles
north-by-northeast from the island and attacked
it."[12]
Message Number 6. June 2:
Fuchida: "The report stated .....that the enemy appeared
to be flying intensive air patrols to the southwest,
probably to a distance of 600 miles; that a strict alert
appeared to be in force, with numerous aircraft on defensive
patrol day and night; and that many construction cranes
were visible on the island, suggesting that installations
were being expanded.[13]
Ugaki: This report is not in Admiral Ugaki's diary.
Message 7: June 2:
Prange: "For example, about this time the Naval General Staff
radioed Yamato that in the eastern Midway area some U.S.
carrier force 'could possibly' be moving or perhaps be
preparing for an ambush. The radio [message] also bore the
First Air Fleet as an addressee."[14]
This quote is taken from Captain Kuroshima aboard the Yamato.
Fuchida and Ugaki do not comment on this message, nor do
Parshall and Tully.
Message Number 8. June 3:
Fuchida: "Within an hour after the split-up of the Main Force,
Admiral Yamamoto received a sudden message from Admiral
Tanaka's flagship Jintsu, which was in direct escort of the
Midway transport convoy, reporting that the convoy had been
discovered at 0900 by an enemy search plane over 600 miles
west of the target
island."[15]
Ugaki: "On the other hand, a report came in that an enemy
plane sighted the invasion force accompanying twelve transports
at a point six hundred miles from Midway at 0600, and the
No. 16 minesweeper Division was
fighting."[16]
Note: The authors quoted above all confirm that Admiral Yamamoto
did receive the above radio messages. In a review of their
books, there is no evidence that Admiral Nagumo received
any of the above eight radio messages.
DISCUSSION: Co-authors Parshall and Tully conclude that Admiral
Nagumo did receive some of the radio messages listed above.
They report the following three messages:(1) "Increased
presence of enemy submarines whose goal was apparently
reconnoitering the Japanese
forces."[17]
(2) "Increased patrolling by American aircraft operating
out of Midway starting around 29
May."[18] (6)
"According to Naval General Staff service message radio
intelligence of 31 May, for the last several days there
has been a tendency for the number of enemy vessels
participating in the Pacific Base Communications System
and the General Ships Communication System centered at
Honolulu to increase."[19]
These messages appear to fit best with messages 1,2, and
6 above.
Now, Parshall and Tully do agree that the Kido Butai
might well have suffered a communications
breakdown."[20]
However, on the basis of the Akagi air group report, they
conclude that Nagumo did receive these three
messages.[21a]
The one caveat in their conclusion is a statement cited by
the authors: "that the report is specific that the information
in hand had been derived from other units, not the Kido
Butai."[21b]
This appears to me to mean that the documentation for
Nagumo's reception of these messages was not derived from
ships within the Japanese Striking Force, but from elsewhere,
and therefore fail to provide the necessary proof that the
messages were actually received by the First Striking Force's
wireless receivers. Certainly, the wartime records revealed
that Admiral Nagumo's estimation of the enemy situation
just prior to launching the Midway attack on 4 June (Midway
date) gave no hint that he had received any of the messages
listed above;[22]
nor does Admiral Ugaki's diary, Fading Victory.
CONCLUSION: First: The documentary evidence supports that
all of the above radio intelligence was available to Admiral
Yamamoto on the Yamato, including the information that a
U.S. Task Force could be waiting to ambush the "Kido Butai"
northeast of Midway. Yet no orders came from Yamamoto to
alert Nagumo that he should consider reappraising the
original operational plan for Midway, as circumstances
dictated.
Second: Independent of the above eight messages, there are
two messages that Nagumo did receive that should have caused
him to pause and consider the possibility that a U.S. task
force might be present on his flank. The first message was
the 0555 report to the "Kido Butai" from Tone's Number 4
Scout plane on 4 June (Midway time): that "15 enemy planes
[possibly Yorktown's scout planes] were heading toward
you."[23]
Reportedly, five minutes later, Admiral Yamaguchi confirmed
a sighting, but when the sighting was not confirmed by
Japanese aircraft, the message was
dismissed.[24]
It appears that Nagumo should have considered that even,
though Tone's number 4 Aichi E13A seaplane was launched 30
minutes late, it had a cruising speed of about 138 miles
per hour, and with a departing time of 0500, the search
plane should have been at least 100 miles out from the
"Kido Butai" at 0555. This analysis makes it unlikely that
the planes seen by Nagumo's force were those sighted by
the Tone search plane. This observation of the distance
that the seaplane was from "Kido Butai" is further
supported by the number 4 Tone's search plane's earlier
report back to Nagumo at 0520, that he sighted two surfaced
submarines about 80 miles from his take-off point. These
observations alone should have caused sufficient alarm to
alter the complacency aboard Akagi, but it had no effect.
In summary, it is reasonable to conclude that it was not
the lack of radio intelligence from the Yamato, but the
inflexibility of Japanese thought, their lack of
adaptability to changing circumstances, and their inclination
to wishful thinking that led both Yamamoto and Nagumo to
contribute to the Japanese defeat at Midway.
Assertion #2: "The Aleutians Operation was an elaborate
feint designed to lure the American fleet out of Pearl
Harbor." Parshall and Tully's response: "Not true. The
simultaneous launch of operations in the Aleutians was
designed to capitalize on the Americans being busy
elsewhere, so that objectives in the Aleutians could be
seized without hindrance. Operation AL was an invasion in
its own right strategically timed and not merely a
diversion."[25]
The authors claim that "Western accounts of the battle
have generally characterized Operational [sic] AL as being
an elaborate diversion in support of Operation
MI."[26] "According
to this interpretation, AL was designed to lure the U.S.
fleet out of Pearl Harbor such that it could be intercepted
and engaged north of Hawaii as it moved to relieve the
Aleutians."[27]
The review of this issue will be derived from the books of
Fuchida, Ugaki, Prange, and the following books: Rear Admiral
Edwin T. Layton's And I Was There, Walter Lord's:
Incredible Victory, and Samuel Elliot Morison's
Coral Sea, Midway and Submarine Actions.
It is interesting to note that even in Fuchida's book:
Midway: The Battle That Doomed Japan, he does not
say that the sole purpose of the Aleutian Operation was
an elaborate feint to lure out the American fleet from
Pearl Harbor. Instead, he noted the following:
Fuchida: "In view of this comfortable margin of superiority,
Combined Fleet decided that the objectives of the Midway
operation could safely be expanded to include the simultaneous
capture of key points in the western Aleutians. ....However,
Combined Fleet strategists calculated that their temporary
seizure, in addition to permitting destruction of enemy
installations there, would serve to protect the northern
flank of the main Japanese trust toward Midway and act as
a diversion which might throw the enemy forces off
balance."[28]
Ugaki does not comment on this issue.
Prange: "The Naval General Staff asked for, and the Combined
Fleet agreed to, a variation of the plan. Yamamoto's original
idea called for massing full strength against Midway. The
Naval General Staff wanted to add a strike against the
Aleutians too. This would be not only a diversionary
operation...but it would be a Navy contribution to the
Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity
Sphere.[1]
The Tokyo planners realized that the foul weather prevalent
in the Aleutians would make them difficult to use as
effective bases, but the area would be the anchor of a
protective arc passing very near Midway and expanding to
the Torres Strait between New Guinea and Australia. Besides,
Japanese control of the Aleutians would preclude the
Americans' running a bombing shuttle from Dutch Harbor to
Vladivostok, in the event Russia came into the war against
Japan."[29]
Layton: "But the capture of the Aleutians was deemed essential
to prevent their being used as bases for long-range air
strikes against Tokyo."[30]
Lord: "Then, since the Naval General Staff was worried about
possible bombings from the Aleutians, he [Yamamoto] also
added an Aleutian attack to the
plan."[31]
Morison: "These islands were wanted to repair that rip in
the 'ribbon defense' through which Halsey had dashed in
April to bomb Tokyo. They would serve as key points in a
new outer perimeter,
Kiska-Midway-Wake-Marshalls-Gilberts-Guadalcanal-Port
Moresby."[32]
Discussion:
There are three points of interest here. First, it is well
documented that the Japan's sole reasoning for invading Midway
was to lure out the American fleet. Certainly, the Japanese
did not feel any feint in the Aleutians would have a high
success of drawing out the American fleet. Second, Dutch
Harbor is over 2000 miles from Honolulu and the Midway attack
was scheduled 24 hours later. Traveling north by northwest,
the American fleet would only have sailed about a third of
the way to the Aleutian Islands, before it would have changed
its course to the west toward Midway. Third, the United
States considered the invasion of the Aleutians significant
enough to send Task Force Eight consisting of two heavy and
three light cruisers with four destroyers to the Aleutian
area. These expendable ships represented about a third of
the major ships present at the Battle of Midway, and to
that extend the invasion of the Aleutians was a successful
feint.
Conclusion: These well-respected books on the Battle of Midway
support the position that the predominant reason for the
Japanese attacks on the Aleutian Islands was to prevent
these bases from being used by the Americans to launch air
attacks against Japan and for the bases to become part of
the Japanese defense perimeter and not to lure the American
fleet out of Pearl Harbor. It is my opinion that there is
no evidence from the historical accounts of the Aleutian
Operation provided above that a myth had been created by
their accounts.
Assertion #3: "'Had the Japanese implemented a two-phase
search plan on the morning of 4 June, they would have succeeded
in locating the American fleet in time to win the battle.'
Perhaps, but in 1942 the Japanese (and Americans) had yet
to incorporate the notion of a two-phase search into their
doctrine. Such a search plan was never an option, and it was
disingenuous for Fuchida Mitsuo to imply that it
was."[33a]
The review of this issue will be derived from the books of
Fuchida, Ugaki and Prange's quote by Rear Admiral Ryunosuke
Kusaka, Chief of Staff of the First Air Fleet.
Fuchida: "Had he employed earlier, two phase search, the
unsuspected enemy task force would probably have been
discovered soon enough to permit Nagumo to strike the first
blow instead of taking it."[33b]
Ugaki: "Searches on the flanks of our force were made with
seaplanes of the Eight Heavy Cruiser Division and bombers
equipped with additional fuel tanks, but their departures
were arranged to be almost simultaneous with that of the
attack force so that they would not miss the area near the
force because of the darkness before dawn. It was on its
return leg that it discovered an enemy task force belated."
(Lesson: As many search planes as possible should be
dispatched as soon as possible. The area near our force
should have be covered with other planes after
dawn.)"[34]
Prange: "Kusaka planned the air search pattern now being
readied for take-off, and in later days blamed himself
harshly for failing to substitute a double reconnaissance.
'I neglected scouting,' he admitted, 'trying to save for
planes for offense.'"[35]
Discussion: Parshall and Tully conclude that a two-phase
search plan was never an option because "It would not be
until May 1943 that Combined Fleet would formally incorporate
two-phase searches into its doctrine, largely as the result
of lessons learned at Midway and in the Solomon
Islands."[36]
They go on to say, "In fact, at this stage in the conflict,
a two-phase search was totally unknown, and single searches
were the only kind of search plans there
were."[37]
Before I respond, a few points are worth noting here. First,
it is not well-appreciated that the two planes from the
Akagi and Kaga covering #1 and #2 (south-southeast direction)
segments of the search arc were Type 97 carrier attack
planes. The Nakajima B5N2 torpedo bomber had a cruising
speed of 161 miles per hour and a range of 528
miles.[38]
These planes left their carriers exactly on time at 0430.
It is also interesting that these planes were allocated to
the least likely sector of the arc which would find the
American fleet.
Second, Nagumo had available two new reconnaissance planes
aboard the Soryu, the Yokosuka D4Y1 modified
dive-bomber.[39]
The plane had a cruising speed of 265 miles an hour and a
range of 850 miles.
These planes were not utilized in the initial search mission,
even when Tone's number 3 and 4 search planes were delayed
12 and 30 minutes in their
departures.[40]
The speed of these planes could have more than made up for
the loss of time incurred by Tone's float planes.
In response to Parshall and Tully, I would first point out
that Fuchida's statement did not categorically state that
the American force would be found nor the battle won. He
wrote, as quoted above, that the American force probably
would be found soon enough and that Nagumo could strike
the first blow rather than take it.
Second, although a two-phase search plan was not part of
Japanese naval doctrine at the time, an adaptation of the
plan certainly could have been implemented on the morning
of 4 June 1942. At the very least, Nagumo had two worthy
search planes, Yokosuka D4Y1s, aboard the Soryu that he
failed to utilize on the first search mission. In addition
to Fuchida, Rear Admiral Kusake also gives testimony to
the fact that the concept of a two-phase search system
existed at the time when he berated himself "for failing
to substitute a double
reconnaissance."[41]
Conclusion: It appears to me once again that the ultimate
failure of the Japanese search plan was their inability
to be flexible, and adapt to changing circumstances. Even
after the Battle of Midway revealed the critical weaknesses
in a single search plan, Japan failed to incorporate a
two-phase search system into their naval doctrine until
almost a year after their devastating defeats off Guadalcanal
in August and October of 1942.
NOTES:
| [1] |
Jonathan Parshall
and Anthony Tully, Shattered Sword (Washington,
D.C.: Potomac Books 2005), p. 101
|
| [2] |
Ibid., p. 100 |
| [17] |
Ibid., p. 101. |
| [18] |
Ibid., p. 101 |
| [19] |
Ibid., p. 101. |
| [20] |
Ibid. p. 101. |
| [21a] |
Ibid., p. 101. |
| [21b] |
Ibid., p. 101. |
| [25] |
Ibid., p. 431 |
| [26] |
Ibid., p. 43. |
| [27] |
Ibid., p. 43. |
| [33a] |
Ibid., p. 432. |
| [36] |
Ibid., p. 108 |
| [37] |
Ibid., p. 108. |
| [38] |
Ibid., p. 480. |
| [40] |
Ibid., p. 483. |
| [3] |
Fuchida, Mitsuo
and Okumiya, Masatake, Midway: The Battle That
Doomed Japan (New York: Ballantine Books, 1955),
p. 110.
|
| [5] |
Ibid., p. 110. |
| [7] |
Ibid., p. 111. |
| [9] |
Ibid., p. 112. |
| [11] |
Ibid., p. 112. |
| [13] |
Ibid., p. 113. |
| [15] |
Ibid., p. 123. |
| [22] |
Ibid., p. 129. |
| [28] |
Ibid., p. 78. |
| [33b] |
Ibid., p. 203. |
| [39] |
Ibid., p. 134. |
| [4] |
Ugaki, Matome,
Admiral, Fading Victory ((Pittsburgh: University
of Pittsburg Press, 1991), p. 131.
|
| [6] |
Ibid., p. 131. |
| [8] |
Ibid., p. 139. |
| [10] |
Ibid., p. 135. |
| [12] |
Ibid., p. 135. |
| [16] |
Ibid., p. 137 |
| [34] |
Ibid., p. 160. |
| [14] |
Prange, Walter et
al., Miracle at Midway (New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company, 1982), p. 146.
|
| [23] |
Ibid., p. 216. |
| [24] |
Ibid., p. 216. |
| [29] |
Ibid., p. 23. |
| [35] |
Ibid., p. 181. |
| [41] |
Ibid., p.181. |
| [30] |
Layton, Edwin,
Rear Admiral, And I Was There (New York:
William Morrow, 1985), p. 385
|
| [31] |
Lord, Walter,
Incredible Victory, (New York: Harper and
Row, 1967), p. 67.
|
| [32] |
Samuel Eliot
Morison, Coral Sea, Midway and Submarine Actions
(Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1988), p. 75.
|
Footnotes:
| [1] |
A concept created
and promulgated by the government and military of
the Empire of Japan which represented the desire
to create a self-sufficient "bloc" of Asian nations
led by Japan and free of Western powers.
|
MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT:
Parts II and III of the critical review of Parshall and Tully's
chapter entitled "Myth and Mythmakers" will follow in the
next two issues of the Midway Sentinel. Now that this
issue of the newsletter is completed, I will devote time to
a very special dinner party which will honor Vice Admiral
William D. Houser, USN (Ret.), who has done so much to promote
the Battle of Midway and to inculcate this historic battle
into the U.S. Navy culture. The plan is to hold the dinner
in the Washington, D.C. area in early to mid June. I will
publish the next issue of the newsletter before June to
offer the details. Chris and I hope to see you soon.
EDITORIAL STAFF:
JAMES M. D'ANGELO
M. CHRISTINE SIMS
ADDRESS:
IMMF
BOX 126
1767 LAKEWOOD RANCH BLVD
BRADENTON, FL 34211-4906
TELEPHONE: (240) 460-0041
WEB PAGE:WWW.IMMF-MIDWAY.COM
E-MAIL:
IMMF42@AOL.COM
|
 |